The Chemical Language of Black Widows: Pheromones and Deception in Spider Silk
Season 2 Episode 13 · Whimsical Wavelengths
Page top ,Episode overview
Whimsical Wavelengths, the 2026 American Writers Awards Science Podcast of the Year, returns to the microscopic scale of communication. In this episode, we investigate the sophisticated chemical signaling system of the Western black widow spider (Latrodectus hesperus).
Far from the aggressive hunters of myth, black widows operate in a world where vision is limited and sound carries poorly. Instead, they rely on a complex chemical language embedded within their webs. We explore how females use pheromones to signal their availability to males, how those signals degrade over time to release "stinky cheese" compounds like butyric acid, and how males respond by "boxing up" the web to signal territory.
This episode bridges the gap between arachnology and analytical chemistry, detailing how researchers isolate nanogram amounts of pheromones to understand one of nature's most subtle mating games.
What we discuss in this episode
- Chemical Linguistics: Why spiders rely on scent and taste rather than sight.
- The "Love Letter" Degradation: How pheromones break down over weeks to signal timing to males.
- Aggressive Courtship: Why males destroy and "box up" the female’s web during mating.
- Pheromone Costs: The evolutionary trade-offs of producing nitrogen-rich compounds.
- Deceptive Signaling: How starved or aging females "cheat" by altering pheromone release rates.
- Spider Defense: Debunking myths about black widow aggression and the reality of their "dry bites."
- Advanced Analysis: Using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS) to detect nanogram-scale compounds.
- Citizen Science: How bioacoustics and neural networks are tracking marine life, similar to chemical detection in arachnids.
Why spider chemical communication matters
Understanding pheromone systems is a cornerstone of pest management. By identifying these chemical markers, researchers can develop strategies to control insect and arachnid populations without relying on broad-spectrum pesticides. Furthermore, this research demonstrates that "attraction" in nature is a function of chemistry, resource management, and honest (or occasionally deceptive) signaling.
Key questions explored
- How do spiders "smell" with their legs?
- Why do black widows use a time-sensitive chemical signal rather than a constant one?
- Is it true that black widows are aggressive? (Spoiler: They prefer running away).
- What is the "Handicap Principle" and how does it apply to spider pheromones?
- Can spiders "cheat" to attract mates when they are old or starved?
Guest: Andy Fisher
Dr. Andy Fisher is an Assistant Professor at the Animal Metabolics and Ecology Lab at Griswold University. An SFU alumnus, Dr. Fisher specializes in the chemical ecology of arachnids. His research combines advanced analytical chemistry—including LC-MS and NMR spectroscopy—with field biology to untangle how spiders communicate in the dark, silent environments of the Pacific Northwest.
Episode context
This episode continues the show’s mission to unpack how "invisible" biology shapes behavior. From the beaches of Tsawwassen to laboratory experiments on web-building, we see how spiders navigate the challenges of mating as sessile organisms. This discussion highlights the intersection of analytical chemistry, behavioral ecology, and the often-misunderstood nature of the black widow.
Chapters
(00:00) 2026 Podcast of the Year!
(01:05) Warning: Arachnophobia
(03:30) Guest: Dr. Andy Fisher
(05:55) How Spiders "See" with 8 Eyes
(08:50) Electrostatic Communication
(12:35) Pest Management vs. Pesticides
(14:35) The Western Black Widow
(17:00) Field Work: How Not to Get Bitten
(22:30) Web Chemistry: Stinky Pheromones
(25:45) Why Males Destroy the Web
(29:50) The Metabolic Cost of Love
(33:15) Deception: The Cheating Widow
(38:10) Mass Spec: Smashing Chemical Legos
(41:40) Seasonality of Sex Signals
(44:55) Sub-Social Web Sharing
(48:20) Black Widow Science Joke
Frequently asked questions
- What is a "dry bite"? A defensive bite where the spider chooses not to inject venom, often occurring when the spider is not threatened.
- Do black widows really kill their mates? In Lactrodectus hesperus, sexual cannibalism is relatively rare (roughly 10% chance), contrary to popular folklore.
- How do spiders communicate without ears? They rely heavily on substrate-borne vibrations and chemical chemoreception (smell/taste).
- Why study pheromones? Beyond arachnology, these pathways provide blueprints for non-toxic pest control in agriculture.
Sources and further reading
- https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2415468121
- https://www.cell.com/iscience/fulltext/S2589-0042(24)01947-3
- https://animal-metabolomics.com/
Episode details
- Podcast: Whimsical Wavelengths
- Style: Interview
- Season: 2 | Episode: 13
- Category: Entomology · Arachnology · Analytical Chemistry · Chemical Ecology
Maars on Mars: Mapping Volcanic Water Interactions on the Red Planet
Season 2 Episode 14 · Whimsical Wavelengths
Page topEpisode overview
What if the most violent explosions on Mars weren't caused by meteorites, but by a "thermal-mechanical shock" between molten magma and hidden reservoirs of ice? In this episode of Whimsical Wavelengths, we dive into the world of Maars (M-A-A-R-S)—shallow, explosive volcanic craters formed by phreatomagmatic activity.
While we often think of Mars as a dry, dead desert, the presence of Maar-diatreme volcanoes suggests a past where rising magma encountered subsurface water or permafrost. We explore the "Marvelous" database—a global catalog of Maar shapes—and discuss how "Mickey Mouse" and "Snowman" shaped craters on the Red Planet serve as pins on a map, helping us reconstruct the depth and abundance of Martian water in the recent geologic past.
What we discuss in this episode
- Phreatomagmatic Paradox: Why water plus magma doesn't always equal an explosion (and the role of the Leidenfrost effect).
- The Carrot in the Crust: Understanding Diatremes, the carrot-shaped volcanic "guts" that extend deep underground.
- Distributed Volcanic Fields: Why these eruptions don't happen on giant peaks like Olympus Mons, but are scattered across regions like Nepenthes Mensae.
- Thermal Inertia: Using day-night temperature changes to distinguish volcanic ash from solid lava flows on a planetary scale.
- Sediment Popsicles: Experimental "goofing" with lava and ice to understand how permafrost reacts to extreme heat.
- Secondary Craters vs. Maars: The detective work required to tell the difference between a volcanic vent and a meteorite's "splash."
- Methane Explosion Holes: A comparison to the non-volcanic craters found in Siberian permafrost.
Why "Maars on Mars" matter
Maars are more than just holes in the ground; they are environmental sensors. Because a Maar requires water to form, each one we find on Mars acts as a "confidence point" for past environmental conditions. By projecting the angles of these craters downward into the "diatreme" structure, geologists can estimate exactly how deep the water or ice table was at the moment of eruption. This research is a critical pillar in the broader hunt for water—and potentially past life—on the Red Planet.
Key questions explored
- How do you pronounce "Maar" without sounding like you're talking about the planet?
- Why is water such an efficient "coolant" for magma?
- How does Martian gravity (38% of Earth's) change the shape of an eruption?
- What can "Mickey Mouse" shaped craters tell us about moving volcanic vents?
- Can we use "carrots" (Diatremes) to map the Martian water table?
-
Chapters
(00:00) Maars on Mars: A Tongue Twister
(02:10) Phreatomagmatic Diatremes Defined
(03:45) Guest: Dr. Allison Graettinger
(05:15) Sociology: Permission to Study Lava
(06:40) Field Work: Dust, Ash, and Gas
(08:30) Why Study Maars? Hazards and Risks
(10:45) Scaling Eruptions: VEI vs. St. Helens
(12:35) Distributed Volcanic Fields Explained
(17:15) Physics of Magma-Water Interaction
(21:50) The Marvelous Database Project
(26:50) Remote Sensing: Thermal Inertia
(30:10) Mars vs. Earth: Gravity and Shape
(34:40) Searching for Craters on Mars
(36:40) "Goofing" with Lava and Ice Popsicles
(41:10) Methane, Permafrost, and CO2 Ice
(43:55) Mapping Water for Future Missions
(48:25) Ducky: The Scientist’s Companion
(51:00) The Science Joke
Guest: Dr. Alison Graettinger
Dr. Alison Graettinger is a Professor at the University of Missouri-Kansas City. A veteran of the Hawaiian Volcano Observatory and Masaya Volcano in Nicaragua, Dr. Graettinger is a world expert in experimental volcanology and the creator of the MaarVLS (Marvelous) databse. Her work involves everything from pouring molten lava onto "sediment popsicles" to mapping the volcanic history of Mars. She is almost always accompanied in the field by her world-famous "companion," a yellow rubber duck that has survived more volcanic plumes than most geologists.
Episode context
This episode reconnects two colleagues who first met in the gas plumes of Nicaragua in 2007. It highlights the collaborative nature of planetary science—where Earth-based fieldwork in the Seward Peninsula of Alaska provides the necessary analogs for interpreting data from the High Resolution Imaging Science Experiment (HiRISE) orbiting Mars.
Frequently asked questions
- Is there still active volcanism on Mars? While most activity ceased millions of years ago, "recent" in geologic terms (the last 100 million years) still shows potential for small-scale events.
- What is a "Phreatic" explosion? A steam-driven explosion that doesn't include new magma, unlike the phreatomagmatic "Maars" discussed here.
- Why are Martian volcanoes bigger? Lower gravity and a lack of plate tectonics allow magma to pile up in the same spot for billions of years.
- What is the "MaarVLS " Database? A systematic catalog of 435+ Maars on Earth used as a training set for planetary identification.
Sources and further reading
- Primary Paper: Identification of candidate Martian Maars in the area of Coales and Nepenthes Mensae (Graettinger et al.)
- The MaarVLS Database: A global resource for Maar volcano locations and shapes.
- Volcanic Analogs: Research on the Espenberg Maars, Seward Peninsula, Alaska.
Episode details
- Podcast: Whimsical Wavelengths
- Season: 2 | Episode: 14
- Category: Volcanology · Planetary Science · Geomorphology · Mars Exploration
Strepsiptera: A Real Xenomorph? Evolution and Life Cycle of Twisted-Winged Parasites
Season 2 Episode 15 · Whimsical Wavelengths
Page topEpisode overview
In the movie Alien, the Xenomorph was inspired by parasitic wasps. But for the twisted-wing parasites (order Strepsiptera), that terrifying life cycle is just a Tuesday. In this episode of Whimsical Wavelengths, we delve into one of the most enigmatic groups in the insect kingdom—a group so strange that for 200 years, scientists couldn't agree on where they belonged in the Tree of Life.
We explore the extreme sexual dimorphism where males possess "raspberry eyes" and zippy wings while females live as internal "worms" that never leave their hosts. We discuss the "genomic revolution" that finally moved these creatures from being "fly-adjacent" to their true home near the beetles, and the mind-blowing discovery that these parasites can actually extend the lifespan of their hosts by up to 13 times.
What we discuss in this episode
- The Strepsiptera Problem: Why 19th-century entomologists couldn't decide if these were wasps, flies, or beetles.
- Extreme Dimorphism: The visual contrast between the iconic mobile males and the stationary, bag-like females.
- Genomic Detours: How sequencing the wrong genes originally told the wrong evolutionary story.
- Traumatic Insemination: The visceral reality of how these parasites reproduce through the host's abdominal wall.
- Behavioral Hijacking: How infected wasps stop acting like social hive members and start acting as "zombie" nurseries.
- Life Extension: The cutting-edge research at the University of Rochester into why infected workers live significantly longer than their healthy counterparts.
- Museum Lifeblood: Why the "back catalog" of natural history museums is essential for modern DNA research.
Why the "Obscure" matters
Strepsiptera might be a small group (only 650 species), but they are heavy hitters in the world of evolutionary biology. Beyond their role in the food web and as natural pest controllers for rice-paddy plant-hoppers, they are now being used as models for aging research. By understanding the specific genes the parasite "turns on" to keep its host alive longer, scientists hope to unlock fundamental secrets of longevity that could eventually influence mammalian science.
Key questions explored
- Why do they have "twisted" wings?
- How does a parasite breathe when it’s buried inside another insect’s blood?
- What is a "cryptic species" and how did DNA find them hiding in plain sight?
- Can a parasite really make its host live 600 "human-equivalent" years?
- How do you count 750,000 larvae crawling out of a single insect's head?
Guest: Dr. Rebecca Jean Miljana
Dr. Rebecca Jean Millena is a postdoctoral fellow at the University of Rochester’s TropBio Lab. A lifelong "bug kid" who began her journey with a wayward pet tarantula, Dr. Miljana obtained her PhD from the American Museum of Natural History’s Richard Gilder Graduate School. She is a specialist in the systematics and evolution of Strepsiptera and a passionate science communicator who has lectured on the biological parallels of the Alien film franchise.
Episode context
This episode explores the "sausage making" of taxonomy—the grueling, detail-oriented work of staring at insects under microscopes to determine species boundaries. It highlights the transition of science from purely morphological judgment to the robust, data-driven world of phylogenomics.
Frequently asked questions
- Do they infect humans? No. Strepsiptera only parasitize other insects (bees, wasps, ants, and grasshoppers).
- What is a "parasitoid"? Unlike a standard parasite, a parasitoid eventually kills or sterilizes its host as a necessary part of its development.
- What is "Matrophagy"? A process where the young consume the resources (and sometimes the tissue) of the mother.
- Where are they found? Everywhere! If you have paper wasps or mining bees in your backyard, you likely have Strepsiptera nearby.
Sources and further reading
- Primary Paper: Strepsiptera's Systematics, Past, Present, and Future.
- Phylogenetic Overhaul: Genomic and Morphological Evidence Converge to Resolve the Enigma of Strepsiptera (2012).
- Host Longevity: Research from the University of Rochester on Xenos peckii and Polistes fuscatus.
Chapters
(0:00) Universal Obscure: Welcome to Strepsiptera
(1:30) Xenomorphs in RL: Parasitoids vs. Parasites
(3:50) "Strepsiptera Problem" in Academia
(5:15) Dr. Rebecca Millena’s "Bug Kid" Origins
(8:00) Twisted Wings & Raspberry Eyes: Anatomy 101
(11:15) Dimorphism: Males vs. Worm-like Females
(14:35) Sexual Hijacking: Pheromones & Ant-Crickets Hosts
(17:40) Cephalothorax: Breathing & Living In a Host
(20:30) Traumatic Insemination & Bag of Larvae
(23:45) Matrophagy: When Young Consume the Mother
(26:50) Taxonomy’s 150-Year Detective Story
(30:50) Genetics vs Morphology: Fly-Beetle Debate
(36:10) Genomic Revolutions: 2012 the Shift to Beetles
(41:40) Cryptic Species: Hiding in Plain Sight
(46:40) Parasites of Parasites: Wolbachia Connection
(53:30) Fountain of Youth? Lifespan Extension in Wasps
(59:45) Museum Research: "Sausage-Making" of Science
(1:05:00) Millipedes & the Science Joke
Episode details
- Podcast: Whimsical Wavelengths
- Season: 2 | Episode: 15
- Category: Entomology · Evolutionary Biology · Phylogenomics · Parasitology
Inclusive Fieldwork: How Accessibility is Changing the Future of Geosciences
Season 2 Episode 16 · Whimsical Wavelengths
Page topEpisode overview
Fieldwork has long been considered a "rite of passage" in the geosciences—a test of physical endurance in rugged, remote terrain. But what happens when that rite of passage becomes a barrier? In this episode of Whimsical Wavelengths, we explore how the "macho" history of field geology is being dismantled to make room for a more diverse, innovative, and accessible scientific community.
Our guest, Professor Brett Gilley, takes us through the results of a unique accessible field trip conducted along the Sea-to-Sky corridor. We discuss the "Universal Design for Learning," why "describing" is the most important verb in a geologist's vocabulary, and how something as simple as a pile of Silly Putty can help a visually impaired student "see" a 3D geological structure.
.
What we discuss in this episode
- The Recruitment Crisis: Why Earth Science is struggling to attract new students and how high school curricula play a role.
- The Vancouver Workshop: The logistics of running a fully accessible trip from Stanley Park to Whistler, including the unexpected barriers (like bus insurance!).
- Multi-Sensory Exploration: Moving beyond the "look at the rock" model to engaging all senses in the field.
- Universal Design: How features meant for accessibility—like high-contrast slides or automatic doors—benefit the entire student body.
- Mission Control Model: A look at NASA-style field schools where students participate via remote "away teams."
- The "Bag of Meat" Philosophy: Why scientists need to remember their physical state (hunger, cold, fatigue) affects the quality of their data.
Why accessibility is academic merit
Making geoscience inclusive isn't just about being "nice"—it's about cognitive diversity. When we exclude students with physical or sensory disabilities, we lose the unique spatial reasoning and problem-solving perspectives they bring to the table. As Brett notes, an accessible field trip isn't a "watered-down" version of geology; it's often a more rigorous and collaborative environment than the traditional "professor-led lecture" in the rain.
Key questions explored
- Does fieldwork have to be a rugged rite of passage to be valid?
- How can a student with low vision "see" an intrusive dyke or a fossil?
- What is the "medical model" of disability vs. the social/identity model?
- Why is the "describe, describe, describe" mantra the key to re-interpretation?
- Is geology really just "rock collecting" for people who aren't good at science? (Spoiler: No.)
Guest: Brett Gilley
<a id="S2E16-guest"></a> Brett Gilley is a Professor of Teaching in the Department of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences at the University of British Columbia (UBC). Known to his students as "GeoDude," Brett is a master of pedagogy and a champion for inclusive education. He is a founding member of the International Association for Geoscience Diversity (IAGD) and has spent over a decade researching how to make the field—and the classroom—a place where every student can succeed.
Episode context
This episode serves as a "lens turn" on the scientific process itself. While geophysicists spend their time mapping the sub-surface, Brett spends his time mapping the barriers in our institutions. We dive into the qualitative data (phenomenology) of the student experience to understand how a single day in the field can transform a student's entire professional identity.
Frequently asked questions
- What is a "Maar-diatreme"? (Referencing the Mars episode link): A volcanic crater formed by an explosive interaction between magma and groundwater.
- What is the IAGD? The International Association for Geoscience Diversity, which recently launched a Canadian chapter.
- Can you be a geologist if you can't hike? Absolutely. Modern geoscience involves everything from satellite remote sensing and lab-based geochemistry to "mission control" style field operations.
Sources and further reading
- Primary Paper: Making geoscience fieldwork inclusive and accessible for students with disabilities.
- IAGD Resources: The IAGD Website
- Video: "Brett GeoDude Gilley" Frequently Asked Questions on YouTube.
- Universal Design: Universal Design for Learning (UDL) in Post-Secondary Education.
Chapters
(00:00) Intro: Rethinking the Degree
(01:50) Fieldwork as a Rite of Passage
(03:20) Guest: The "Rate My Prof" Legend
(06:10) Why High Schools Skip Geology
(09:30) Funding and Enrollment at UBC
(13:20) Why Geoscience is Unique for DEI
(15:15) Designing the Vancouver Workshop
(17:40) Inspiration: Mammoth Cave
(21:00) Redefining "Disabled" in the Field
(23:45) Data: Transforming the Experience
(28:00) "Hold My Dog": Scrambling Blind
(31:20) Multi-Sensory Exploration
(35:30) Meta-Discussion: Validating Disability
(39:00) Universal Design for Learning
(42:20) Silly Putty and 3D Models
(45:45) Post-COVID: Mission Control Learning
(50:00) Geodude: The IMDB Mystery
(53:30) Call-outs: Join the IAGD
(55:00) The Punchline: Geologists vs. Engineers
Episode details
- Podcast: Whimsical Wavelengths
- Season: 2 | Episode: 16
- Category: Pedagogy · Geosciences · Accessibility · Diversity & Inclusion
Of Cows and Cures: Reconstructing the Logic of Vaccination
Season 2 Episode 17 · Whimsical Wavelengths
Page topEpisode overview
In response to a listener's request for better tools to navigate modern medical misinformation, this solo episode dives deep into the history and philosophy of immunology. We trace the lineage of medical breakthroughs, beginning with the catastrophic population loss of the 14th century and ending with the modern wellness industry's attempts to revive 19th-century theories.
The episode examines how the "Sausage Making of Science"—the slow accumulation of instruments, staining techniques, and repeatable data—eventually allowed us to stop guessing and start engineering. We break down the crucial difference between "Germ Theory" and "Terrain Theory," explaining why one survived contact with reality while the other became a marketing tool for the wellness economy.
What we discuss in this episode
- The Black Death as a Baseline: Life before microscopes, where disease was viewed as divine will or "miasma" (bad air).
- Pattern Recognition vs. Mechanics: How medieval observations of horse handlers and dairy workers hinted at cross-immunity long before we knew what a bacterium was.
- The Microscope Revolution: The technical hurdles of resolution and contrast, and how staining techniques finally made the invisible identifiable.
- Variolation to Vaccination: The "terrifying gamble" of early inoculation and Edward Jenner's 1796 leap with cowpox.
- The Great Debate: Louis Pasteur's Germ Theory versus Antoine Béchamp’s Terrain Theory—and why the ability to make "risky predictions" decided the winner.
- The Modern Wellness Echo: How the "Make America Healthy Again" (MAHA) movement and influencers like the "Medical Medium" use outdated 1850s logic to sell "detox" products.
- Vaccine Engineering: A timeline of innovation, from the first process-driven rabies vaccine in 1885 to the rapid deployment of mRNA platforms.
Prediction as the pivot of truth
A central theme of this episode is why Germ Theory remains the gold standard of medicine. Science isn't just about describing what happened; it's about predicting what will happen. Germ Theory made "risky" predictions: if you kill the germs, the infection stops. When surgeons began sterilizing tools, mortality rates didn't just dip—they collapsed.
In contrast, Terrain Theory (the idea that only the body's internal environment matters) is often "narratively flexible." If someone gets sick, the theory claims the terrain was weak; if they don't, it was strong. This retrofitting of facts is why it thrives in the "wellness" economy today—it offers a sense of total control, even when the biological reality is far more complex and probabilistic.
Key questions explored
- Why did governments in Venice pick exactly 40 days for "quarantine"?
- How can the body's immune system be trained to recognize toxins instead of just pathogens?
- Can a "perfect" diet and wellness routine actually protect you from a virus?
- What is the "secondary infection" trap, and how do vaccines prevent it?
- Why does the word "vaccine" actually mean "cow-stuff"?
Host: Jeff Zurek
Jeff Zurek is a Canadian geophysicist and volcanologist who usually spends his time mapping the sub-surface plumbing of active volcanoes. In this special solo episode, he applies the "engineering mindset" to the history of medicine. Jeff focuses on the methodology of science—how we use instruments to extend our senses and how we build logical frameworks that must survive contact with repeatable data.
Episode context
This episode serves as "ammunition" for listeners who find themselves in debates about the validity of modern medicine. It focuses on the social economic determinants of health—acknowledging that while "terrain" (nutrition, stress, poverty) absolutely modifies how sick you get, the microbe remains the necessary trigger that starts the fire. It is an exploration of how scientific discipline separates cause from coincidence.
Frequently asked questions
- Do mRNA vaccines change your DNA? No. They provide a temporary set of instructions for your cells to build a "protein flag" so your immune system can recognize a threat. They never enter the nucleus where your DNA is stored.
- Does "detox culture" have any scientific basis? Your liver and kidneys are already "detoxing" your system 24/7 for free. Most commercial detoxes use scientific-sounding metaphors but lack measurable endpoints.
- Why do we need boosters? Immunity isn't a simple "on/off" switch. Some responses decay over time or need reinforcement as pathogens evolve. Boosters are timed based on measured antibody decay and memory cell persistence.
Sources and further reading
- Historical Figures: Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, Edward Jenner, Louis Pasteur, Robert Koch, and Antoine Béchamp.
- Epidemiology: John Snow and the 1854 Broad Street pump map.
- Modern Analysis: The WHO-Lancet analysis on the 154 million lives saved by vaccines in the last 50 years.
- The First Clinical Trial: James Lind’s 1747 study on scurvy and citrus fruit.
Chapters
(00:00) Intro: The 50% Mortality Rate
(01:50) The "Sausage-Making" of Science
(03:15) MD vs. Geophysicist: A Disclaimer
(05:00) Medieval Responses to the Plague
(07:25) Miasma: Correlation vs. Causation
(09:00) The Biology of Yersinia pestis
(11:30) Why Stable Hands Survived
(14:15) Quarantina: The Biblical 40 Days
(17:00) The Microscope Resolution Barrier
(21:45) Debunking Spontaneous Generation
(24:00) Variolation: The Scab Gamble
(27:15) Cowpox: The Latin Root of Vaccines
(32:25) The Debate: Germs vs. Terrain
(35:45) MAHA and 19th-Century Clichés
(37:30) Why Germ Theory Won
(40:40) Engineering the Rabies Vaccine
(45:20) Timeline: From Antitoxins to Polio
(48:30) Conjugate Vaccines & Sugar Coats
(51:00) The Logic of Vaccine Schedules
(53:40) Goop and the Wellness Economy
(56:30) Pathogens as Terrain Modifiers
(01:01:00) Conclusion: A Microbial Story
Episode details
- Podcast: Whimsical Wavelengths
- Season: 2 | Episode: 17
- Category: History of Science · Immunology · Critical Thinking · Public Health
